« December 2004 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Prove Me Wrong
Treading Lightly On Powdered Sugar
Tuesday, 14 December 2004
Alive and Kickin'
They need to kill Scott Peterson.
Why? I'll tell ya why. BECAUSE HE KILLED SOMEONE ELSE. That simple.
Now I know that I've always shied away from politicalness, because I don't vote and therefore have no right to bitch and moan, but COME ON. The guy SLAUGHTERED his wife and unborn child, and went about his business.
I'm no good at picking the bad guy. When Polly Klaas was kidnapped and murdered all those years ago, I had my finger pointed at her dad, because he looked eeeevil. I was wrong. But I digress.
But they found Scott Peterson guilty, and sentenced him to death. Problem with that is the California death penalty process is so fucked up that he'll probably never die unless someone kills his ass in jail (crossed fingers). As of now, there are 641 inmates rotting on death row in San Quentin, and none of them are movin' on up. The last execution was in 2002, for a guy who committed his crime in 19-fucking-80. This is why I adore Texas.
If these people were found guilty, and SENTENCED TO DIE, don't you think that that should happen fairly soon after having the shit passed down? This almost makes me beg for prison riots among inmates.
This is why I'm glad I don't live in California anymore.
Normally, I am a liberal type for a lot of stuff. I'm down for oscialized medicine, gay marriage, all that good hot-buttony goodness. But I still believe in my heart of hearts that if you're told that you're gonna die, you should fucking DIE, not wait fifteen years backed up in appeals court just because of fucking due process. Give them TWO appeals, that's it. Then kill 'em.
I feel better now.
Next entry.

Rattled Out By Queenie at 4:30 AM

Tuesday, 14 December 2004 - 5:16 AM

Name: Carla
Home Page: http://kittie_moon_36323.tripod.com/blahblah/

Since he killed an unborn baby as well, they should try to kill him twice--give him the injection of ALMOST the lethal amount until he is just unconcious, then bring him back around, let all the big boys in prison have their way with him and then kill give him the lethal injection.

I swear he deserves the chair. or public stoning..yeah bring that shit back. In some countries they stone people to death for lesser crimes, like adultry...here you kill your wife and unborn son and you get put to sleep like a dog at the pound. Go figure. I hated that fucker since i first saw him on the news.

Tuesday, 14 December 2004 - 7:01 AM

Name: Batman

Woohoo!!!! Fry Scott Peterson!!!! You are absolutely right Queenie...PResident Bush had the most carried out executions in Texas history when he was governor. I like to think we made an example....I know that murder is down like 35% in Texas. Anyway...I hadn't posted to your site in awhile so I decided to make myself a nuisance again. At least I am not speaking in third person. Take care Queenie, and I hope you are feeling better from that bug you had this weekend. You missed a pretty good birthday.

Tuesday, 14 December 2004 - 7:33 AM

Name: Queenie

And since WHEN was the fucking electric chair so damned inhumane? That man should FRY for what he did. I think it's stupid that they would make it so easy for the dude to die (IF they ever get around to it), especially ince you know that his wife didn't go quietly.
You think that maybe they could drag him over some nails, then sponge him off with ammonia first?

Tuesday, 14 December 2004 - 7:36 AM

Name: Queenie

Actually, I'm sicker now than I was this weekend...I won't go into details but let's just say that I have a toilet impression permanently on my butt....
And yes, for those of you who HAVEN'T been paying attention, as Batman clearly states with his joyous woo-hoo, Scott Peterson should die. Soon. Immediately.
But since they're not even having the sentence hearing until February, I will have to find something else to gnaw on.

Wednesday, 15 December 2004 - 5:09 AM

Name: wally edmond
Home Page: http://wallyedmond.tripod.com/wallyedmond/

Q,

I prefer the "Hanging Judge Roy Bean's," method of execution, for ANYONE who purposely takes another's life!
Jail 'em, let 'em watch the gallows built, and then string up their ass! The only "due process" back then, was the process of the hangman saying, "Do you have any last words, asshole!?", and then letting the floor drop! However, the irony of it all, is that back then you'd get strung up quicker for stealing a horse; let alone, for murdering your wife and child. May that bastard rot in hell!

Thursday, 16 December 2004 - 3:59 PM

Name: chinq

Q,

Sorry, not a pro-death penality person. I remember that line from an old western, "Hangin's too good for'um."

And until the system's fullproof, there's just too much politics involved to kill someone as a punishment.

But that's just me, it's your blog, so have a party.

Chinquapin

Friday, 17 December 2004 - 12:25 AM

Name: Queenie

See? SEE?!?!? This is why I shy away from the political on my damn blog and make it as puff pastry as possible. Well, that and the fact that I'm not really a follower of the news and stuff.
But Chinq has a point. With no set death penalty system, with the sentence mandated by each individual state, how can it be fullproof?

Friday, 17 December 2004 - 9:10 AM

Name: chinq

Q,

Sorry to cause trouble. The entire trial/jury system confounds me. Fluffy-puff pastry, my fav!!(Da*n, now I'm drooling)

Chinquapin

Friday, 17 December 2004 - 10:09 AM

Name: Quennie

Naw, it ain't even about causing trouble. I'm one of those unfortunate bastards that has total faith in the trial by jury thing, due to the ungodly amounts of Law & Order that I subject myself to EVERY DAY. I mean, we made the checks and balances of a trial by peers system so that we COULD pass down the law accoriding to....
FAHK.
You know, I don't even have a damn clue about what I'm talking about. I don't even watch the local news.

Friday, 17 December 2004 - 3:58 PM

Name: chinq
Home Page: http://chinquapin2.tripod.com/nutty/

Q,

LOL, another L&O junkie.

Chinquapin

Tuesday, 19 July 2005 - 7:46 AM

Name: BEAR

I truly am amazed at all you peolpe that want to hang an innocent man - there is NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE he committed the crime - all eveidence is circumstancial - he is a womanizing liar - BUT, if all womanizing liars were executed, the populate dwould decreaseby over 50% -
He was tried by media & convicted there -
I will defend yours & anyones right to an opinion - even if it is wrong - BUT, how would you like to be tried & convicted on circumstancial evidence??
Think about it!!

View Latest Entries